British - Victrix painted by James Fergusson. Lancers - Perry painted by Kevin East. Photo by Kevin with digital effects by CG |
Based on experience from the first game I decided to start this one off with various units already in very close proximity and having suffered either 10% or 20% casualties from fire on the approach to combat. This would help us test the morale rules and effects of attrition and disorder. It proved a good idea which got us into tense situations straight away and lots of varied action even though we only managed three game moves! More on that at the end.
Once more we cobbled together a makeshift basic battlefield approximately 6 feet square plus a little outlying table (on the right here) to accommodate a French Horse Artillery Battery and another out of shot, further back for French Foot Artillery.
Positions at the start Allies on the left, French on the right. |
Some closer views by Kevin of (mostly his) French cavalry, today commanded by Richard Newcombe |
First action was joined by testing the Chasseurs against a British square.
Both sides had 20% casualties already on the assumption of cannon fire on the infantry and musketry on the cavalry. We know cavalry had very little chance of charging home on a good square but the "melee" dice are intended to reflect this and the cavalry lost enough to make their morale very poor, yet the infantry lost some too.We should have some bodies really to represent all the cavalry casualties! |
The outcome was that the cavalry rolled bad morale dice and fled the field ( they could rally off table) and the face of the square was left clear for French foot artillery to re-commence round shot fire from their off-field position. There were 3 model guns and a howitzer playing on this square and, after the first effect, we had a 4,5,6 chance of a "second graze" bounce for ball in the muddy conditions and when this occurred the side companies and the colour party took casualties too. Note this size square is only a "wing" or half battalion and made up of heterogenous units from larger scale games; in our refight most battalions will be about 75% larger.
At the same time the French Line Lancers braved some close range canister and ploughed into the Royal Foot Artillery battery. It was a foregone conclusion and the surviving gunners were driven back onto their supporting teams with great loss.
We deemed that the lancers would have their formation disrupted by going through the gun line but not suffer any morale detriment as they carried on to engage the fairly helpless teamsters.
The resulting losses destroyed the battery and what remained fled the field, leaving the elated lancers very disrupted and vulnerable if the initiative tokens fell right for the Allies.
Meanwhile losses had mounted on the British square who had been watching without any musketry targets as 95th Riflemen in the nearby wood used their longer range to pot at the Guard Lancers. A Morale check for the square forced a retreat and luckily they had the breathing space to form column, otherwise it could have been disaster. The Coldstream Guard Light Company is helping cover their retreat.
Why had the powerful Dutch and Polish lancers of the Guard not attacked earlier? The answer was that a lucky roundshot in the first move's salvo from the RFA battery had taken off the head of their commander. My WMaB1815 rules deliberately put great store on leaders so although their morale was sound they could not move forward until the Brigade commander got back to appoint a new leader.
Back up on the ridge top the initiative fell right for Kevin who had his Light Cavalry squadrons just off table at that point. They charged forward and the consequent morale check by the weakened Line Lancers was enough to see them scurrying back down hill without waiting to be sliced up.
British Light Dragoons and King's German Legion Hussars |
Line Lancers scurrying back through a gap between the supporting squadrons |
The road up the middle of the table, and the need to deploy cavalry away from the central farm effectively made two separate battles only connected by the wing of the 95th Rifles. Its three companies I'd formed as one administrative unit of about 80 figures but with their own leaders so each company could perform independently if required. It took a bit of head scratching , and clarification of the "Disorder" status rules to make the best of this but I see it as an essential part of the transition from skirmish scale to "big game". The sizes of units combined with the terrain they try to occupy becomes much more taxing at this scale since very little is representational. This side of the battle opened with one Rifle company in skirmish line and the order of initiative was vital. It turned out that the French Dragoons moved first and the skirmishers were caught.
Perry plastic Dragoons by Richard Newcombe Mixed manufacturer's 95th Rifles by CG |
The Rifles fired first and the Dragoons took casualties but not enough to stop them so we fought through a melee in which, not surprisingly, the thin line of engaged Riflemen lost about half their figures. It wasn't a huge impact on the Wing as a whole and this company was able to withdraw at the double (being skirmishers - 120 paces per minute) to one side out of direct line of the cavalry advance. Kevin was able to bring them together with the reserve company and all formed a square near the walls of the farm. The IGO/UGO nature of the game may seem to give a rather staccato appearance to what should be a fluid movement, but what matters is the result and the "fog of war" we can't enjoy from our God-like wargamer stance. Put simply, heavy cavalry had suffered some losses but swept aside a skirmish line, the survivors of which ran away to reform with their mates. I think it worked OK so I'm going to celebrate with this brilliant photo by Kevin which I had fun digitally enhancing.
That mounted Major model is on loan from the Hanoverians till I convert something appropriate |
RHA and photo by Kevin. We should really have twice as many gunners at 1:3 so had to just count them notionally. For the real game crews will be augmented by other project members. |
While this was going on Richard had eschewed the higher ground I had placed for his Horse Artillery in favour of limbering them up and bringing them onto the main table, clear of the cavalry squadrons where they could hammer the RHA battery with canister. The 95th Rifles square had conveniently got out of the way by retreating behind the farm when they saw the horse guns approaching.
A clear field of fire |
Kevin has augmented his normal French HA crews models with extras for this scale |
The British also had a Guards infantry battalion ready to come on via the road but we just ran out of time.
So we had planned to have about 1100 figures potentially in play but in fact about a third of them didn't make it onto the table in the time we had available - like the first game, about 4 hours play mixed with 3 more hours talking about rule mechanisms. Only three complete turns were made so about 10-12 minutes "real time" and about 30-40 minutes in my "historical schedule".
Kevin explains one of his movements to Richard (A 1:100 model of the impending new Gregg dwelling on the mantelpiece) |
As you can see from some photos the systems produced some sudden changes of fortune and on this scale large open spaces resulted. This felt right to me and I quote from Captain Kincaid's eye witness account of Waterloo from the sandpit near LHS when his Riflemen began to take a toll on Cuirassiers engaged with Allied Light Dragoons ".....when they instantly opened a terrific fire on the whole concern, sending both sides to flight; so that, on the small space of ground, within a hundred yards of us, where five thousand men had been fighting the instant before, there was now not a living soul to be seen".
In the previous blog one reader very reasonably asked how we will cope with the timing to get the whole game done. My hope is based on the following:
- We will schedule two days over a weekend to play about 4 to 5 hours of historical time.
- so that means about 20 Moves
- there will be about 3000 figures in play but not all at once, over a table at least 12 feet x 6 feet plus extensions giving even more usable space.
- the command system means not every unit can be active every turn but at least one command from each side can play concurrently with two umpires adjudicating
- there will hopefully be about 5 wargamers per side so each will probably command only 2-3 major units at a time not the 7 to 10 in this test game.
I'll leave you with just one small part of the most amazing Waterloo Panorama painting, a memento from Kevin and my trip to the battlefield this June......I think we are getting it right.
I'll leave you with just one small part of the most amazing Waterloo Panorama painting, a memento from Kevin and my trip to the battlefield this June......I think we are getting it right.
Fantastic post - well done!!!
ReplyDeleteStill looks great already and sounds like its coming together.
ReplyDeleteThinking about that column of squadrons that pulled chits in the wrong order, it sounds like it went the way you want but it brought to mind that I used to play with flexible levels of units based on formation. In other words a squadron would be a unit when by itself but when properly formed with other squadrons with regimental commander present then the whole moved as one but had to maintain formation. Since I used card activation by unit the deck had to be adjusted inbetween turns as units formed up or made detachments.
I'm looking forward to the next installment. Good job by all of you.
Brilliant ,how good do the figures look when put together.
ReplyDeleteGreat post .
All the best mark
Gregg Looks great I hope the Scarborough game looks as good, I have 300 French Inf and 60 Carbinieres for that weekend.
ReplyDeleteMartin K
Thanks all for your appreciation.
ReplyDeleteThe Initiative chits issue was purely due to the player choice. We have numbered counters but not enough for every unit. You can use the chain of command to economise on chits where it exists close enough to units. In this case poor Kevin only had one senior cavalry commander for 5 squadrons. He chose to give the 3 squadrons each a chit (random and unseen)and unfortunately they came up in the wrong order. I don't allow close order pass throughs at this scale.The squadron in this case were from different regiments anyway.
Chris
Wow, what an incredible post; blog post of the year award material.
ReplyDeleteThe photoshopped pics are really really amazing.
Wow, Baconfat, what incredible praise, thank you - makes it all worthwhile when readers comment so enthusiastically.
ReplyDeleteChris G
BRAVO!
ReplyDeletemost certainly the look is getting there!
Formidable! I have only just become aware of your marvellous project, thanks to David aka MurdocK. Brilliant stuff!!
ReplyDeleteThanks james fisher for the super comment. These little nudges of encouragement keep us going knowing that the more figures we paint the nearer to the project goal we will be. The scenario showed some large scale groupings of figures but our active games next summer will be more impressive with even bigger groupings and of course with the 'real life' wonderful scenery created by CG that I know he is capable of. Can't wait for it really!!!!
ReplyDeletekevin East
And thanks Kevin for your faith in my scenery. To be honest I can't wait to get into my new place and get cracking on it, but it will probably have to wait till after the depths of Winter now. Meanwhile my 190 Luneburgers are well over the half way mark and only about another 500 figures of other units to paint after that :-)
ReplyDeleteChris G
I have put a link to this play-test on the Wargaming Waterloo 2015 blog, which is dedicated to providing links to games of the bicentennial years that have been played/are planned by wargamers around the world (http://waterloo2015.blogspot.com.au).
ReplyDeleteThanks very much James.
ReplyDeleteCG
I initially thought that picture at the top was a still from Waterloo! Stunning stuff!
ReplyDeleteVery detailed report Chris,
ReplyDeleteCan't believe how much work you guys have put into this project.
Welldone. Mark
What a great battle and report! Fantastic pictures. Thanks for that!!
ReplyDeletePeter